Getting out of the slush pile

At a recent con I met a fairly big name science fiction writer–multiple Hugo and Nebula awards and a publication history that goes back to when I was . . . very young.  We did a panel together and, some time later, met in the Con Suite (a room at most science fiction conventions, usually with drinks and snacks, sometimes real food, where folk can relax, meet, and talk) where we chatted.  One of the things he did was give me some advice on advancing my career–what cons I should attend in order to meet editors and agents in the hopes of doing business, that sort of thing.

One of the things he said was that if I wanted to be successful I had to “get out of the slush pile.” (the “slush pile” being that gigantic stack of manuscripts that people send in hoping to be published.) As he explained it, first readers have to reject some large number of manuscripts per hour (this is forced by the reality that a very large number of manuscripts are submitted but only a few can be published).  Now, while most stories submitted can be easily rejected (bad manuscript format, poor spelling and grammar, that sort of thing) even on the “possibles” (which includes your story, right?  You’ve cleaned up the spelling and grammar?  You’ve made sure to put it into proper manuscript format?  You’ve done all that right?) a decision has to be made quickly.  And in that rush it’s entirely possible for good stories to get overlooked.  In fact, good stories are going to be rejected because there are more good stories than there are slots at any paying publishing house.

If I understand what he was telling me, the best chance you have, if your story is any good, is if you can avoid the “slush pile” and get directly to an editor who might buy your work rather than being handled by a first reader whose job is to reject as much as he can as fast as he can.

And that was when we got to talking about conventions.  A bit later I mentioned a book manuscript I was shopping around and mentioned that I was limited because only a couple of the major publishing houses accepted unagented manuscripts.  He promptly named two that I had missed and mentioned that the editor of one of them had recently won a major industry award.  I took out my iPod Touch and quickly noted this information down, asking the writer to repeat the name of the editor so I got it correctly.

When I got home, I mentioned this to another writer I know and in an email I laughingly said I should submit the story saying “Author XXX suggested I send this to you.”

My friends reply was a single line: “Author XXX recommended you as a possible contact.”

Oh.  He was serious.

And so I sent off the manuscript (that publisher takes submissions via email) with a cover letter starting exactly as my friend suggested.

In a matter of a couple of hours I got a reply that said “I’ll take a look on XXX’s recommendation.”


So two days later I get another response. “Thanks but no thanks.”


Well, I got out of the slushpile but, in this case, it was just to get a faster rejection.

Oh well.  That’s the way the game is played.

Advantages of being a writer

I’m working on a story in a new (to me) genre (in this case, Paranormal Romance).  I have to get familiar with that genre if I am going to write effectively in it.

That means I can read novels back to back and feel virtuous about it because it’s work. 😉

Sex in fiction

In a recent discussion on Facebook, I made a tongue-in-cheek reference to a writer friend of mine’s book and the supposed “explicit sex” in it.  The joke was to apologize for calling the sex explicit when, from the romance novels I have been reading (I have a story concept under development for a paranormal romance and am familiarizing myself with the genre) it was hardly explicit at all.

The book, by the way, is Freehold by Michael Z. Williamson and is an excellent read if you like books about successful Libertarian societies with lots of military action and a moderate amount of sex. (I happen to like those kinds of books).  You can buy it on Amazon as well as other places:

Well, in comments on the thread, some folk mentioned how they didn’t like to read about explicit sex with the statement that “Sex is not a spectator sport.”

Well, when I read, what happens on the page is not a “spectator sport” for me.  I tend to identify with one or more of the characters and essentially live the story through them.  My “identifier” is quite flexible and I’m fully capable of “being” for the course of the story, folk as diverse as Miss Marple, Herald Mage Vanyel, Kendra Pacelli, Bernie Rhodenbar, or Frodo.  If you don’t recognize all of them, that’s okay.  You can Google them if you want.  Go ahead.  I’ll wait.  Back?  Okay, that said, when sex happens in a story I’m not watching it, I’m living it through the character.  Let me hasten to clarify that I’m living it in my mind.  This is purely an intellectual and emotional exercise.  There’s no physical involvement except my eyes moving down the page and my hands turning those pages.  Okay?  That clear?  Good. 😉

So, when the sex in the story has no significant impact on the character development or story progression, that’s one thing.  George sleeps around a lot.  He stops off at Jill’s and, some time later, leaves while zipping up his pants.  The sex is part of George’s character but the sex act doesn’t affect his character or move the plot.  In this case, little more is called for than the bare fact that George and Jill had sex.

In other stories, however, the act of sex does have a significant effect on character development or plot.  In those cases, I believe the sex does need to be “on screen” and told in exactly the same detail that any other plot mover/character development scene would be told.  Sex with Jill didn’t mean anything to George but with Ellen?  Wow.  There was something different about that, something that made all others pale into insignificance.  Maybe it was because Ellen was the only one who really knew George, who knew the secrets George kept hidden from the world, understood him in a way that no one else can.  That scene needs to be shown because that scene marks a change in George’s character and to not show it is to give the reader no more reason for George’s change than “because the author said so” (which rarely works).  And when writers elide over those kinds of scenes (as was the case in many romance novels of a few decades ago–yes, this isn’t the first time I’ve researched the genre) I find it jarring.  It tends to throw me out of the story and I have to spend some effort getting back in.

Writers have no problem writing grisly murders, horrible tortures, and many other things when they are important to the development of the story and its characters (and even when they are not, but more on that another day).  But a lot of writers and, apparently, a lot of readers (which gives an excuse for the writers) seem to shy away from presenting this one aspect in the same detail that these other things are shown.  To some extent that has changed–particularly in the Romance genre if the paranormal romances I have been reading are any indication–but the stigma about explicit depictions of sex still seems to be there in a lot of fiction.

Not every story needs to have sex just like not every story needs to have a murder or not every story needs to have someone lose their job or not every story needs to have Timmy fall down a well, but it is, or should be, just as valid in a story as any of those other aspects.  And if it is there, I believe the writer should be able to show it on the same footing as any other plot/character motivator.  If the murder matters to the story, you describe it in detail.  If the sex matters to the story, that, too should be described in detail.

Stories are about people.  People, among other things, have sex.  Sex is one of the more powerful motivators in life.  That large numbers of people think that such a powerful motivational factor needs to be avoided or hidden in fiction has always struck me as odd.  And while the taboos are breaking down, they are still there.  And while they are there, I guess, writers will have to deal with that reality one way or another.

Notional cover design

While I’m shopping around my novel “The Hordes of Chanakra” (and also considering the possibility of self-publishing) I thought I’d amuse myself by creating a notional “cover” using public domain artwork (in this case a painting by Ivan Aivazovsky “The Battle of Sinor” painted in 1853).

Note however that the book has not been published.  This is just an artistic exercise at this time.


Currently reading….

“Confessions of a Stripper:  Tales from the VIP room” by Lacey Lane.

You see, one of the main character in a WIP (Work In Progress) is an exotic dancer.  Rather than rely on Holywood nonsense like Striptease, I’m looking for “real” stories as a basis for character creation.  This includes books by actual dancers as well as talking to people who are in, or have been in, the business.