Election day

Short one today.

Another election day has rolled around.  Yes, I did my civic duty and voted.

And yet, on my news feed in another forum I have been seeing a number of posts on the topic of how useless voting is.  One has this stock picture with text about how the person doesn’t vote because voting is choosing who will be master over ones neighbor and nobody has the legitimate authority to do that.  Another has a picture of the scene from Charlie Brown where Lucy is holding the football and Charlie Brown is getting ready to kick it (or not, as this generally goes) with “Go ahead.  It will be different this time.  And, of course, there’s the late George Carlin’s comedy routine on not voting.

Then there’s the old standby of insanity being defined as doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. (Funny thing is, I’ve never seen an actual definition of insanity–which is a legal, not a medical, term–that said that.)

A lot of people, particularly among the conservative to libertarian folk, are very dismissive of the idea of voting.

I just have one question:  How is not voting supposed to help?  I mean, aside from giving the person taking that position a sense of smug self-righteousness?

Seriously, how is not voting supposed to help?  Are the candidates who win (candidates who don’t are a non-issue since they have no power, not being in office) supposed to look at low voter turnout and say “well, we need to change to appeal to all those people who couldn’t bother to vote”? Do you actually think that’s even a remote possibility?

Or perhaps you think that staying away will let things collapse that much faster and we can have a civil war and….  Um.  Whatever fantasies you might tell yourself, if you actually look at history, revolutions and civil wars have a very bad record when it comes to producing anything good.  The American revolution was very nearly unique in that regard and relied on a widespread popular support for the ideals of freedom (however poorly implemented at the time) that, if we actually have here would mean that we wouldn’t actually need a civil war to implement pro-liberty policies.  And if we don’t, what naive self-delusion makes you think a civil war followed by a Consititutional Convention–with delegates chosen by the same people who send representatives to Washington now–will produce any better results than voting does now.  And that’s assuming that other powers don’t use the idea of such civil unrest in the US as an opportunity to put their own thumb on the scales to their advantage rather than ours.

The best I reason I can come up with, really, is folk are denigrating voting simply to make themselves feel good, not to accomplish anything in the larger world.  If that’s what you want, then more power to you.

Just close the door and wash your hands afterward.

3 thoughts on “Election day”

  1. Well… a low voter turnout does represent an untapped source of political power for any politician who can figure out what the non-voters want.

    On the other hand, there seem to be no politicians looking to do that.


  2. I vote. I have voted in every election I have been legally able to do so. However, there are three reforms that I would consider to be CRITICAL to the fairness and integrity of the process:
    – Voting materials in English only. Isn’t the citizenship test only done in English? Therefore, we can assume that anyone who is eligible to vote has a working knowledge of the language (at least well enough to take an exam in the workings of government and the history of our nation.)
    – Proof of citizenship, for elections at ALL levels. (If you want to have a say in what’s going on around here, get naturalized. Otherwise, we’ll just assume you don’t give enough of a damn to bother.)
    – No “early results” posted by the news. No influencing polls in California or Hawai’i with results from New York or Florida. Nope – election counts get covered at the 9:00 news – tomorrow morning (which should also give enough time for hand-counted ballots to be counted as well, for people like us who prefer voting on paper.)

    – The first one only makes sense.
    – The second one is easy enough – states are rolling out “RealID,” and that requires proof of citizenship, which makes your driver’s license a proof of citizenship. Or have a passport. And don’t give me any grief about how it will “disenfranchise the people on welfare” – you /must/ have a birth certificate and an iD to sign up for welfare (legally,) so why don’t they have the cert already? And the RealID is issued by the Motor Vehicle people, so it’s not a special trip. (Married women have to produce one more document – their marriage certificate. So that’s two. (In addition to a social security card, in most jurisdictions, for both sexes)
    – The third one also only makes sense – and for a similar reason, EVERY state should have its primary election on the same day, with reporting happening at the same time (on the following morning’s news.) It’s not nice to dick around with other people’s votes…


    1. Here’s a question… Why do we have primary elections at all? A political party should be able to nominate any candidate its members choose, by whatever method pleases them.

      Primaries are an unnecessary and undesirable interference by local governments in the party’s business.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: